Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Biogas and Energy Recovery Potential of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste using Anaerobic Digestion

Atul Kumar, Rahul Agrawal

Abstract


Cow dung was found to be feasible and effective in transforming the organic waste into biogas. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cow dung on the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The study was carried out in laboratory-scale batch reactors of 1 liter capacity at mesophilic temperature (i.e., 35°C). The reactors were fed with different loading ratios of OFMSW and cow dung (0.5, 0.63, 0.75, and 1.0). The results obtained revealed that that cow dung is an effective co-digestion substrate for anaerobic digestion, achieving high cumulative biogas yield with stable performance. The reactors with a substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 0.5 showed maximum biogas yield of 186.67 mL/g of volatile solids. A modified Gompertz equation model was used to perform the kinetic studies of the anaerobic batch reactors. The model was used to study the effect of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on biogas generation. The model showed a better fit to the experimental results with R2
values of more than 94% in all the reactors. The model simulation results and the experimental data suggest that co-digestion of OFMSW and cow dung improved the biogas generation, and maximum biogas production could be achieved at a substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 0.5.


Keywords


Anaerobic digestion, biogas, co-digestion, cow dung, municipal solid waste

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abubakar BS, Ismail N. Anaerobic digestion of cow dung for biogas production. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2012;7:169-172.

Ali S, Shah TA, Afzal A, Tabassum R. Exploring lignocellulosic biomass for bio-methane potential by anaerobic digestion and its economic feasibility. Energy Environ. 2018;29(5):742-751. doi:10.1177/0958305X18759009.

Awasthi SK, Joshi R, Dhar H, et al. Improving methane yield and quality via co-digestion of cow dung mixed with food waste. Bioresour Technol. 2018;251:259-263. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.063.

Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Rice EW, ed. American Public Health Association; 2012.

Breitenmoser L, Gross T, Huesch R, et al. Anaerobic digestion of biowastes in India: opportunities, challenges and research needs. J Environ Manage. 2019;236:396-412. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.014.

Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Accessed November 7, 2019. http://dahd.nic.in/related-links/chapter-v-part-2; 2019.

Gaur RZ, Suthar S. Anaerobic digestion of activated sludge, anaerobic granular sludge and cow dung with food waste for enhanced methane production. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;164:557-566. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.201.

Ghosh A, Sarkar JP, Das B. A critical analysis on anaerobic digestion of OFMSW in India. Waste Valorisation and Recycling. Springer; 2019:237-245.

Kor-Bicakci G, Ubay-Cokgor E, Eskicioglu C. Effect of dewatered sludge microwave pretreatment temperature and duration on net energy generation and biosolids quality from anaerobic digestion. Energy. 2019;168:782-795. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.103.

Kumar A, Samadder SR. An empirical model for prediction of household solid waste generation rate–A case study of Dhanbad, India. Waste Manag. 2017;68:3-15. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.034.

Kumari K, Suresh S, Arisutha S, Sudhakar K. Anaerobic co-digestion of different wastes in a UASB reactor. Waste Manag. 2018;77:545-554. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.007.

Li R, Chen S, Li X. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production. Energy Sources A. 2009;31(20):1848-1856. doi:10.1080/15567030802606038.

Li Y, Jin Y, Li H, Borrion A, Yu Z, Li J. Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste. Appl Energy. 2018;213:136-147. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.033.

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. Energy statistics 2017. Accessed November 15 2018. http://www.mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Energy_Statistics_2017r.pdf.pdf/.

Neves L, Oliveira R, Alves MM. Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 2004;39(12):2019-2024. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2003.10.002.

Nixon JD, Dey PK, Ghosh SK. Energy recovery from waste in India: an evidence-based analysis. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2017;21:23-32. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2017.04.003.

Oh JI, Lee J, Lin KA, Kwon EE, Fai Tsang Y. Biogas production from food waste via anaerobic digestion with wood chips. Energy Environ. 2018;29(8):1365-1372. doi:10.1177/0958305X18777234.

Panigrahi S, Dubey BK. A critical review on operating parameters and strategies to improve the biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew Energy. 2019;143:779-797. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.040.

Pivato A, Vanin S, Raga R, et al. Use of digestate from a decentralized on-farm biogas plant as fertilizer in soils: an ecotoxicological study for future indicators in risk and life cycle assessment. Waste Manag. 2016;49:378-389. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.009.

Rahman KM, Harder MK, Woodard R. Energy yield potentials from the anaerobic digestion of common animal manure in Bangladesh. Energy Environ. 2018;29(8):1338-1353. doi:10.1177/0958305X18776614.

Surendra KC, Takara D, Hashimoto AG, Khanal SK. Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;31:846-859. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015.

Zamanzadeh M, Hagen LH, Svensson K, Linjordet R, Horn SJ. Biogas production from food waste via co-digestion and digestion-effects on performance and microbial ecology. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17664. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15784-w.

Zhai N, Zhang T, Yin D, et al. Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cow manure. Waste Manag. 2015;38:126-131. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.027.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijpnc.v8i2.1520

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.