Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Design And Fabrication Of Foot Wear Garbage Reinforcement Fly Ash And Paver Block

Murugananthan K, Silamparasan P, Vignesh L, Praveen C, Narayanasamy P

Abstract


Nowadays, the paving blocks and fly ash that in the market are heavy and the price are costly. This study will introduce the lightweight paving blocks and more affordable because the foot wear waste materials are use in the development of the concrete paving blocks and fly ash bricks namely as Eco-Friendly Paving Block and fly ash are make. Eco paving blocks will be compared to control paving blocks due to its durability and compressive strength. The method and test for concrete work was conducted which is density test and compressive strength test. The result shows that Eco-Friendly Paving Block can be used at non-traffic area based on their compressive strength the 20% of strength is reduced compared to the normal paver block value and the density is 5% is decreased. The uses of this waste material also can reduce the amount of environmental pollutants such as water, soil pollution and when heating the foot wear air pollution.

Keywords


Fly Ash, Paver Block, Foot wear waste, Compressive strength and Density Calculation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Guo, Z., Tu, A., Chen, C., Lehman, D.E., 2018b. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of concrete building blocks incorporating recycled concrete aggregates. J. Clean. Prod. 199, 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.07.069. Gupta, S., Patel, P., Mondal, P., 2022.

Life cycle analysis (LCA) and economic evaluation of catalytic fast pyrolysis: implication of co-product’s end-usage, catalyst type, and process parameters. Sustain. Energy Fuels 6, 2970–2988. https://doi.org/10.1039/ d2se00079b.

Life cycle assessment of end-of-life treatments for plastic film waste. J. Clean. Prod. 201, 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.278. Javadabadi, M.T., 2019.

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Incorporating Recycled PET Aggregates into Concrete, pp. 1–75. Kumi-Larbi, A., Yunana, D., Kamsouloum, P., Webster, M., Wilson, D.C., Cheeseman, C., 2018. Recycling waste plastics in developing countries: use of low-density polyethylene water sachets to form plastic bonded sand blocks.

Waste Manag. 80, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.003. Kurda, R., Silvestre, J.D., de Brito, J., 2018. Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash.

Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 139, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2018.07.004. Leslie, H.A., van Velzen, M.J.M., Brandsma, S.H., Vethaak, A.D., Garcia-Vallejo, J.J., Lamoree, M.H., 2022. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ. Int. 163, 107199 https://doi.org/10.1016/J. ENVINT.2022.107199.

Gu, L., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2016). Use of recycled plastics in concrete: A critical review. Waste Management, 51, 19-42.

Iucolano, F., Liguori, B., Caputo, D., Colangelo, F., & Cioffi, R. (2013). Recycled plastic aggregate in mortars composition: Effect on physical and mechanical properties. Materials & Design (1980-2015), 52, 916-922.

Mehdipour, I., & Khayat, K. H. (2017). Effect of particle-size distribution and specific surface area of different binder systems on packing density and flow characteristics of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 78, 120-131.

Pressley, P. N., Levis, J. W., Damgaard, A., Barlaz, M. A., & DeCarolis, J. F. (2015). Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment. Waste Management, 35, 307-317.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijmmp.v9i2.1586

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.