A case study on selection of best manufacturing materials using decision making tools
Abstract
In order to address the challenges faced by decision-makers in the manufacturing industry MCDM processes plays a vital role in industrial applications for selecting the most suited material. These challenges include selecting the appropriate alternative for various factors such as materials, robots, and oxy-rich materials, which may have conflicting criteria. MCDM involves considering multiple criteria to choose from a set of alternatives, which can be finite or infinite. One well-known MCDM method is ELECTRE (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite), which translates to "Elimination and Choice Expressing the Reality." ELECTRE II, a practical MCDM method, is recognized for its effective ranking technique and has found successful applications in various real-world scenarios. In the specific context of selecting the best oxy-rich material, ELECTRE II is utilized due to its widespread adoption across diverse manufacturing fields.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Rao, R.V. Decision making in the manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods, 2007, Springer, London.
Liu, P. & Zhang, X. Research on the supplier selection of a supply chain based on entropy weight and improved ELECTRE-III method, International Journal of Production Research, 2010, 49, 637-646.
Cho, KT. Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 37, 1099–119.
Rao, R.V. A decision-making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method, Material Design, 2008, 29, 1949–54.
Pandey, P.C. and Kengpol, A. Selection of an automated inspection system using multi-attribute decision analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 1995, 39, 289–298.
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V., Chakraborty, S. Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2010, 26, 483-489.
Valiris,G., Chytas,P., Glykas.,M. Making decisions using the balanced scorecard and the simple multi-attribute rating technique, Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2005, 6, 159-171.
Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H. and Wallenius, J. “Multiple criteria decision support: a review”, European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 63, 361-75.
Zionts, S. MCDM “If not a Roman numeral, then what?” Interface, 1979, 9, 94-101.
Cho, KT. Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, 37, 1099–119.
Pandey, P.C. and Kengpol, A. Selection of an automated inspection system using multi-attribute decision analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 1995, 39, 289–298.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijmmp.v9i1.1568
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.