Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Software compatibility & execution with additive manufacturing machine

Sandeep. U. Belgamwar, Nikhil S. Sanga, Rohan P. Kalwade, Tejes A. Shinde, Pradnya R. Shinde

Abstract


The usage of additive manufacturing (AM) for production and final products is expanding quickly. In greater numbers than ever, machineries are able to consistently produce high-quality parts that take use of the inventive complexity presented by the sector. However, the transition from an idea to produced items using digital technology is less seamless and less profitable than it should be. AM components OEMs, AM-enabled job shops, and service bureaus invest a lot of time in training new operators in AM skills, and they have all run into the same problem: it is still very difficult to produce the topologically optimised, geometrically convoluted, and gradually planned designs that the designers have in mind. Typically, the designer needs a machinist's production expertise to convert their designs into tool paths that can be manufactured. This concept to manufacture translation—from concept to manufacture—becomes a matter of software and places the duty of fabrication-readiness towards the developer and the electronic tool set. Additive manufacturing relies directly on a digital model of a component's geometry for fabrication. A number of commercial software businesses are attempting to complete the multi-step process of taking an offering from its initial concept to a final part that is appropriate for AM. The problem of software interoperability, which is claimed to cost the car company alone about $2 billion or more each year, is a fundamental difficulty in this situation. An innovative, field-driven design method built on implicit modelling is presented via a platform-based process, which is illustrated later in this article. It effectively eliminates many of the bottlenecks that develop while experts attempt to design. The underlying difficulty of converting the design into a manufacturing format that can be easily read and used by a 3D printer persists even after a final design has been created. As stated in a 2019 Wikipedia article, "Software that is the key accelerator of AM" and none is this more evident than when manufacturing instructions are communicated to the machine.

Keywords


Additive Manufacturing, OEMs, software interoperability

Full Text:

PDF

References


John Solomon, P. Sevvel, J. Gunasekaran, "A review on the various processing parameters in FDM",Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 37, Part 2, 2021, Pages 509-514.

Xing Peng, Lingbao Kong, Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh and Hao Wang, "A Review of Post-Processing Technologies inAdditive Manufacturing", Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2021, 5, 38.

Eda Hazal Tümer and Husnu Yildirim Erbil, "Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Applications of PLA Composites:AReview", Coatings 2021, 11, 390.

Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Government of India, “ National strategy for additive manufacturing next generation digital manufacturing.”




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijmmp.v9i1.1567

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.