Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The use of Six Sigma methodologies for improving productivity in industrial operations

Shubhaseesh Srivastava

Abstract


In in order to improve effectiveness and reduce waste in industrial processes, the Six Sigma technique utilizes data-driven assessment. To find and reduce sources of variability and flaws in manufacturing techniques, the plan enables use of statistical tools and techniques. Six Sigma works to improve output consistency and quality by eliminating variability, therefore boosts output and earnings.

Numerous industries, including manufacturing, retail, and healthcare, have used Six Sigma methodology with great success. Displaying, including those on the production line, in the supply chain, and in customer service, can be simplified using these strategies.

When integrating Six Sigma principles to industrial operations, there are numerous important procedures that must be taken. These comprise defining the concern, assessing the process's performance levels, examining the data to find the sources of variability and faults, enhancing the process by removing sources of uncertainty, and regulating the process to insure consistent performance across time.

Having a disciplined and data-driven commitment to strategy and direction is one of the biggest benefits of employing Six Sigma methodology to increase productivity in industrial operations. With the use of this strategy, companies are able to spot areas that need improvement objectively, assess the effects of those achievements, and keep those improvements over time.

In theory, utilizing Six Sigma approaches can be an important technique for raising productivity in industrial settings. Six Sigma may help firms dramatically enhance their bottom line by eliminating variability, providing better, and improving efficiency.


Keywords


Six sigma technology, DMAIC, root cause analysis, lean six sigma, statistical process control.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Harry, Mikel J. (1988). The Nature of six sigma quality. Rolling Meadows, Illinois: Motorola University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-56946-009-2.

Dodge, John (10 December 2007). "3M Shelves Six Sigma in R&D". Design News. Archived from the original on 2010-03-05. Retrieved 2013-04-02.

Celegato, Alessandro (2017). "IN MEMORY OF EGIDIO CASCINI" (PDF). Statistica Applicata: Italian Journal of Applied Statistics. 29: 107–110.

Albliwi, S.; Antony, J.; Halim Lim, S.A.; van der Wiele, T. (2014). "Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 31 (9): 1012–1030. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-09-2013-0147.

De Feo, Joseph A.; Barnard, William (2005). JURAN Institute's Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond – Quality Performance Breakthrough Methods. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. ISBN 0-07-059881-9.

Ficalora, Joe; Costello, Joe. "Wall Street Journal SBTI Rebuttal" (PDF). Sigma Breakthrough Technologies, Inc. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2007-10-15.

Harlow, Lisa Lavoie; Stanley A. Mulaik; James H. Steiger, eds. (1997). What If There Were No Significance Tests?. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 978-0-8058-2634-0.

Morrison, Denton; Henkel, Ramon, eds. (2006) [1970]. The Significance Test Controversy. AldineTransaction. ISBN 0-202-30879-0.

Ruffa, Stephen A. (2008). Going Lean: How the Best Companies Apply Lean Manufacturing Principles to Shatter Uncertainty, Drive Innovation, and Maximize Profits. AMACOM (a division of American Management Association). ISBN 978-0-8144-1057-8.

Hindo, Brian (6 June 2007). "At 3M, a struggle between efficiency and creativity". Business Week. Retrieved 2007-06-06.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijied.v8i2.1532

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.