Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
ML & Robotics Integrated with AUVs for Sub-Aquatic Applications.
Abstract
In the modern era of ground robots and flying Drones, the importance of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) cannot go remiss. Through customized sensor package either tethered to a Remote Operated Vehicle or onboard, an AUV is able to conduct tests, surveil, identify and monitor the underwater environment. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep learning with a vast array of algorithms have led to cutting edge results both dynamic and in real-time to accurately represent the underwater environment. To begin with, this paper will present the theoretical choices available for the control architecture which dictates the extent of autonomy of an AUV, followed by application-specific requirements. We will also touch upon the utility of AUVs and robotics for possibilities of underwater human habitation as an alternative to address the increasing scarcity of land. It has also had a tremendous impact in the naval sector, particularly coastal patrolling and safeguarding territorial waters from nefarious activities. The various issues concerning AUVs and robotics, drawn from the research work of researchers and scientists, that are an irritant across applications are also discussed. Notwithstanding, ML with its application-specific and groundbreaking algorithms has given enormous processing power. Therefore, this paper purports to examine how AUVs have made underwater terrain mapping, mineral exploration, disaster management, conservation and restoration of endangered coral reefs possible with increased efficacy and reduced time, thereby becoming the cornerstone reference for further research in this field.
Keywords
References
Bellingham JG. Platforms: Autonomous underwater vehicles. 2009.
Fay D, Stanton N, Roberts AP. Exploring Ecological Interface Design for Future ROV Capabilities in Maritime Command and Control. 2018; Spronger, 2018. 264–273.
Krishnan A, Shandilya S, HS B, et al. A Review on Applications of Carbon Nanotubes in Auto mobiles. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2020;11(1).
Fabbri C, Islam MJ, Sattar J. Enhancing underwater imagery using generative adversarial networks. 2018 May 21–25; Brisbane, QLD, Australia: IEEE. 2018. 7159–7165.
Li D, Wang P, Du L. Path planning technologies for autonomous underwater vehicles-A review. IEEE Access. 2018;7:9745–68.
Petres C, Pailhas Y, Patron P, et al. Path planning for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2007; 23(2): 331–41.
Choi HT, Sur J. Issues in software architectures for intelligent underwater robots. In Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications. Springer. 2014: 831–839.
Carreras M, Batlle J, Ridao P. Hybrid coordination of reinforcement learning-based behaviors for AUV control;2001 29 Oct-03 Nov; Maui, HI, USA, USA. IEEE; 2002. 1410–1415.
Pang S, Farrell JA, Arrieta RM, et al. Auv reactive planning: deepest point. IEEE. 2003; 4: 2222–2226.
Jain N, Virmani D. Feature classification for underwater seismic prediction using wireless sensor nodes. 2017 Mar 15–17; Hong Kong: IMECS; 2017.
Bhandarkar T., Vardaan K., Satish N., et al. Earthquake trend prediction using long short-term memory RNN. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2019; 9(2): 1304.
Petillo S, Schmidt H, Balasuriya A. Constructing a distributed AUV network for underwater plume-tracking operations. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2011; 8(1): 191235.
Tholen C, Nolle L. Parameter search for a small swarm of AUVs using particle swarm optimisation; 2017; Springer; 2017. 384–396.
Gokaraju B, Durbha SS, King RL, et al. A machine learning based spatio- temporal data mining approach for detection of harmful algal blooms in the Gulf of Mexico. IEEE Journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing. 2011; 4(3): 710–20.
Kukulya AL, Bellingham JG, Stokey RP, et al. Autonomous chemical plume detection and mapping demonstration results with a COTS AUV and sensor package. IEEE. 2018; 1–6.
Parker L, Welch C. Coral Reefs Could be Gone in 30 Years. National Geographic. 2017.
Mahmood A, Bennamoun M, An S, et al. Automatic annotation of coral reefs using deep learning. IEEE.2016:1–5.
Mary NA, Dharma D. Coral reef image classification employing improved LDP for feature extraction. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation. 2017;49:225–42.
Villon S, Chaumont M, Subsol G, et al. Coral reef fish detection and recognition in underwater videos by supervised machine learning: Comparison between Deep Learning and HOG+ SVM methods; 2016; Springer; 2016.160–171
Lopez-Vazquez V, Lopez-Guede JM, Marini S, et al. Video image enhancement and machine learning pipeline for underwater animal detection and classification at cabled observatories. Sensors. 2020; 20(3): 726.
Joseph A. Investigating Seafloors and Oceans: From Mud Volcanoes to Giant Squid. Elsevier.2016.
Caress DW, Thomas H, Kirkwood WJ, et al. High-resolution multibeam, side scan, and subbottom surveys using the MBARI AUV D. Allan B. Marine habitat mapping technology for Alaska. 2008: 47–69.
Diesing M, Green SL, Stephens D, et al. Mapping seabed sediments: Comparison of manual, geostatistical, object-based image analysis and machine learning approaches. Continental Shelf Research. 2014; 84: 107–19.
Jiang Y, Li Y, Su Y, et al. Route optimizing and following for autonomous underwater vehicle ladder surveys. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 2018; 15(6): 1729881418813271.
Ishihara, Takemi, et al. Development of an underwater gravity measurement system with autonomous underwater vehicle for marine mineral exploration. Techno-Ocean (Techno-Ocean). IEEE, 2016.
Shanmugam S, Srinivasa Perumal P. Spectral matching approaches in hyperspectral image processing. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2014; 35(24): 8217–51.
Spectral Angle Mapper. L3Harris Geospatial Solutions, Available: https://www.harrisgeospatial.com/docs /SpectralAngleMapper.html. Accessed On: Jul. 04, 2020 [Online].
Sudharsan S, Hemalatha R, Radha S. A Survey on Hyperspectral Imaging for Mineral Exploration using Machine Learning Algorithms;2019 Mar 21–23; Chennai, India, IEEE. 2020; 206–212.
Williams DP. On optimal AUV track- spacing for underwater mine detection; 2010 May 3–7; Anchorage, AK, USA, IEEE; 2010; 4755–4762.
Sariel S, Balch T, Erdogan N. Naval mine countermeasure missions. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2008; 15(1): 45–52.
Yordanova V, Griffiths H. Synchronous rendezvous technique for multi-vehicle mine countermeasure operations. IEEE. 2015; 1–6.
Azad S, Casari P, Zorzi M. Coastal patrol and surveillance networks using AUVs and delay-tolerant networking. IEEE. 2012:1–8.
Fossum T. Intelligent autonomous underwater vehicles. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Tech. Rep. 2016.
Park JY, Jun BH, Lee PM, et al. Modified linear terminal guidance for docking and a time-varying ocean current observer. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Underwater Technology and Workshop on Scientific Use of Submarine Cables and Related Technologies. IEEE. 2011: 1–6.
Mock-Bunting L. The many challenges of underwater communication. Schmidt Ocean Institute. 2016.
Lloret J, Sendra S, Ardid M, et al. Underwater wireless sensor communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM frequency band. Sensors. 2012; 12(4): 4237–64.
Centelles D, Soriano-Asensi A, Martí JV, et al. Underwater wireless communications for cooperative robotics with UWSim-NET. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(17): 3526.
Wyman KM, Williams NR. Migrating boundaries. Fla. L. Rev. 2013;65:1957.
Cossu G, Corsini R, Khalid AM, et al. Experimental demonstration of high speed underwater visible light communications. In 2013 2nd International Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications (IWOW). IEEE, 2013:11–15.
Bradley AM, Feezor MD, Singh H, et al. Power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of oceanic Engineering. 2001; 26(4):526– 38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37628/ijra.v6i2.1120
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.