Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Effect of specimen size and geometry on the fracture toughness of materials

Amit Shishodia

Abstract


The power of an element to endure tensions and forces without separating is determined in large part
by its fracture durability, which is a measure of its resistance towards crack initiation. The ability to
break down of a specimen can be substantially affected by its shape and design.
Due to the smaller size of any faults any imperfections that might have been visible within the substance
itself, the ability to break down of the specimen typically rises as the sample's dimensions decreases.
The reason for this is so that the component becomes better susceptible to hole proliferation since
lesser imperfections make lower of an impact on the metal's total resilience.
Nevertheless, the piece's structure additionally impacts its breaking tenacity. For instance, even though
there are both samples are of similar number, one which has an abrupt hole or cleft might exhibit
poorer crack toughness than another without more gradual change from the previously unbroken to the
destroyed region.
The strength of the fracture may be further impacted by the specimen's location in relation to the axis of
forcing. Depends on how the fracture is oriented with relation relative to the material's axial axes, the
breaking strength of material that is anisotropic can change.
A specimen's resilience to fractures will be strongly affected by its measurement and design. Larger
portions usually exhibit better fracture resilience, yet the piece's design and alignment can also have an
impact. Thus, the when assessing the durability of fractures, it is crucial to pay close attention to the
shape and dimension of the sample to be able for precise and valuable results.


Keywords


Toughness, crystallographic, single-edge notched beam, Brittle damage, ANOVA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kawai M, Mitani S. A size effect law for notched tensile strength of woven carbon/epoxy

laminates. Advanced Composite Materials 2016;25:177–207.

Castrodeza EM, Bastian FL, Perez Ipiña JE. Fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-metal

laminates: Crack orientation effect. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2005;72:2268–79.

Bhagat RK, Singh VK. Effect of specimen geometry on stress intensity factors of inclined crack by

finite element method. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 2013;13:463–9.

Shih CF, O’Dowd NP, Kirk MT. A framework for quantifying crack tip constraint. In: Constraint

effect in fracture. ASTM STP 1171. American Society for Testing and Materials; 2002. p. 2–20

Gao X, Dodds RH. An engineering approach to assess constraint effects on cleavage fracture

toughness. Engng Fract Mech 2001;68:263–84.

Zhou DW, Xu WG, Smith SD. R-curve modeling with constraint effect. In: Proceeding of the 12th

international conference on fracture, Ottawa, Canada, July 12–17, 2009.

Joyce JA, Davis DA, Hackett EM, Hays RA. Application of J-integral and modified J-integral to

cases of large crack extension. In: Fracture mechanics: twenty-first symposium. ASTM STP 1074.

American Society for Testing and Materials; 1990. p. 85–105.

Landes JD, McCabe DE. Effect of section size on transition temperature behavior of structural

steels. In: Fracture mechanics: fifteenth symposium. ASTM STP 833. American Society for

Testing and Materials; 1984. p. 78–392.

Paris PC, Tada H, Zahoor A, Ernst H. The theory of instability of the tearing mode of

elastic–plastic crack growth. In: Elastic–plastic fracture. ASTM STP 668. American Society for

Testing and Materials; 1979. p. 5–36

McCabe DE, Landes JD. J–R curve testing of large compact specimens. In: Elastic–plastic fracture

mechanics. ASTM STP 803, vol. II. American Society of Testing and Materials; 1983. p. II-353–71


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.