Review on Computer-Aided Manufacturing, Just in Time Production, Total and Quality Management

Authors

  • Deepak Singh Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad
  • Ankur Patel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37628/jcam.v3i1.348

Abstract

Performance measurement systems have been varying according to the high-level competitive features of modern manufacturing environments. In this study, the production and management techniques such as Computer Aided Manufacturing(CAM), Just in Time(JIT) and Total Quality Management(TQM) that have been largely discussed and kept in the forefront will tried to be explicated. In this frame, by using the data collected from 122 manufacturing businesses among the first 500 huge businesses in Turkey in the year 2006, this paper surveys how a multiple performance measurement system is related with applications of CAM, JIT and TQM. The results show that greater emphasis on the usage of a multi-dimensional performance measurement system directed at performance evaluation is associated with making greater use of CAM, JIT and TQM system.

Author Biography

Deepak Singh, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad

PG Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

. S.M. Abernethy, A.M. Lillis. The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design, Account Organ Soc. 1995; 20/4: 241–58p.

. A. Allott. Some academics say management accounting has not changed in the last 60 years; others say it has-hugely who’s right, asks Anita allott? Manage Account: Magaz Chart Manage Account. 2000; 78(7).

. A.A. Atkinson, R.S. Kaplan, S.M. Young. Management Accounting. 4th Edn., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.

. R. D. Banker, et al. Reporting manufacturing performance measures to workers: an empirical study, JMAR. 1993; 5: 33–55p.

. W. Bruggeman, R. Slagmulder. The impact of technological change on management accounting, Manage Account Res. 1995; 6: 241–52p.

. J.L. Callen, et al. Productivity measurement and the relationship between plant performance and JIT intensity, Contemp Account Res. 2005; 22(2): 271–309p.

. K. S. Cavalluzzoa, C.D. Ittner. Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government, Account Organ Soc. 2004; 29: 243–67p.

. C. B. Cheatham, L.R. Cheatham. Redesıgnıng cost systems: is standard costing obsolete? Account Horiz. 1996; 10(4).

. R.H. Chenhall. Reliance on manufacturing performance

. measures, total quality management and organizational performance, Manage Account Res. 1997; 8: 187–206p.

. S.J. Daniel, W.D. Reitsperger. Linking quality strategy with management control system: empirical evidence from Japanese Industry, Account Organiz Soc. 1991; 16: 601–18p.

. S. Davis, T. Albright. An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance, Manage Account Res. 2004; 15: 135–53p.

. M. Dilber, N. Bayyurt, S. Zaim, M. Tarim. Critical factors of total quality management and its effect on performance in health care industry: a Turkish experience, Prob Perspect Manage. 2005; 4: 220p.

. C. Drury. Cost control and performance measurement in an amt environment, Manage Account. 1990; 40–1p.

Published

2017-10-06

Issue

Section

Articles