Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

FEM and Discomfort Analysis of Different Muscles and Joints During Welding Operation

SUMAN DAS, Debamalya Banerjee, Sabarni Chakrabarty, Shankarashis Mukherjee

Abstract


Discomfort and injuries are highly associated with different joints and muscles in welding operation. Knee, wrist, hip, elbow and glenohumeral joints are the most complex and maximum used joints in human anatomy. Stabilities of these joints are the critical aspects which are provided by the different muscles and ligaments. The behavior of the different joints and muscles during operation is the major concerns for discomfort and injury analysis. The objective of this present research work is to obtain the intensity and distribution of stresses and discomfort level in the different joints and muscles during welding operation. The three-dimensional (3D) CAD model of the entire human body is developed in solid works software and FEM is used for stress analysis. The maximum von Mises stresses are also notice. It is observed that the intensity of stresses and the von Mises stresses are good injury indicators for the body muscles and joints independent of load direction. NIOSHs discomfort survey method is used for mapping the different areas of pain, dissatisfactions during the operation. This present research work provides a broad information’s to the researchers for better understanding about the most stressed muscles and joints during welding.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Aaras, R.H. Westgaard, E. Stranden. Postural angles as an indicator of postural load and muscular injury in occupational work situations, Ergonomics. 1998; 31(6): 915–33p.

A. Ali, S.M. Qutubuddin, S.S. Hebbal, A.C.S. Kumar An ergonomic study of work related musculoskeletal disorders among the workers working in typical Indian saw mills, Int J Eng Res Dev. 2012; 3: 38–45p.

T. Jafry, D.H. O’Neill. The application of ergonomics in rural development: a review, Appl Ergon. 2000; 31: 263–8p; T. Jones, S. Kumar. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment output in four sawmill jobs, Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010; 16(1): 105–11p.

A. Choobineh, M. Lahmi, H. Shahnavaz. Musculoskeletal symptoms as related to ergonomic factors in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry and general guidelines for workstation design, Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2004; 10: 157–68p.

P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Srivastava. Ergonomics risk factors in some craft sectors of Jaipur, HFESA J Ergon Aust. 2012; 24: 4–14p.

S. Gangopadhyay, S. Dev. Design and evaluation of ergonomic interventions for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in India, Ann Occup Environ Med. 2014; 26: 1–6p.

M.L. Meena, G.S. Dangayach, A. Bhardwaj. Occupational risk factor of workers in the handicraft industry: a short review, Int J Res Eng Technol. 2012; 1(3): 194–6p.

A. Nag, H. Vyas, P. Nag. Gender differences, work stressors and musculoskeletal disorders in weaving industries, Ind Health. 1997; 48: 339–48p.

G. Cheung, P. Zalzal, M. Bhandari, J.K. Spelt, M. Papini. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading, Med Eng Phys. 2004; 26: 93–108p.

M. Dalstra, R. Huiskes, L. van Erning. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone, J Biomech Eng. 1995; 117: 272–8p.

D.R. Pedersen, R.A. Brand, D.T. Davy. Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait, J Biomech. 1997; 30: 959–65p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.