A Fluid–Structure Interaction Study on the Rupture Vulnerability of Different Types of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque
J R Doherty, D M Dumont, G E Trahey, M L Palmeri. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of vulnerable plaques: a finite element method parametric analysis. J. Biomech. 2013; 46: 83–90p.
M Cilla, E Peña, M A Martínez. 3D computational parametric analysis of eccentric atheroma plaque: influence of axial and circumferential residual stresses. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2012; 11: 1001–1013p.
M Naghavi. Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology, Detection, and Treatment. New York: Humana Press; 2010.
W J S Dolla, J A House, S P Marso. Stratification of risk in thin cap fibroatheromas using peak plaque stress estimates from idealized finite element models. Med. Eng. Phys. 2012; 34: 1330–1338p.
M Cilla, E Peña, MA Martínez, DJ Kelly. Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology. J. Biomech. 2013; 46: 1248–1254p.
A Valencia, Baeza F. Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction in stenotic arteries considering two layer nonlinear anisotropic structural model. Int. Commun. Heat. Mass. 2009; 36: 137–42p.
M X Li, J J B Brandt, LR John, P R Hoskins et al. Numerical analysis of pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall mechanics in different degrees of stenoses. J. Biomech. 2007; 40: 3715–24p.
G Finet, J Ohayon, G Rioufol. Biomechanical interaction between cap thickness, lipid core composition and blood pressure in vulnerable coronary plaque: impact on stability or instability. J. Coron. Artery Dis. 2004; 15: 13–20p.
Z Teng, U Sadat, Z Li, X Huang et al. Arterial luminal curvature and fibrous-cap thickness affect critical stress conditions within atherosclerotic plaque: an in vivo MRI-based 2D finite-element study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010; 38: 3096–3101p.
J Ohayon, G Finet, A M Gharib, D A Herzka et al. Necrotic core thickness and positive arterial remodeling index: emergent biomechanical factors for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008; 295: 717–27p.
T Belzacq, S Avril, E Leriche, A Delache. A numerical parametric study of the mechanical action of pulsatile blood flow onto axisymmetric stenosed arteries. Med. Eng. Phys. 2012; 34: 1483–1495p.
A M Varnava, P G Mills, MJ Davies. Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation. 2002; 105: 939–943p.
A Kashefi, M Mahdinia, B Firoozabadi, M Amirkhosravi, et al. Multidimensional modeling of the stenosed carotid artery: A novel CAD approach accompanied by an extensive lumped model. Acta Mechanica Sinica. 2014; 30: 259–273p.
Z Teng, U Sadat, G Ji, C Zhu, et al. Lumen irregularity dominates the relationship between mechanical stress condition, fibrous-cap thickness, and lumen curvature in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. J. Biomech. Eng. 2011; 133: 034501p.
M J Lipinsky, J C Frias, H A Fayad. Advances in detection and characterization of atherosclerosis using contrast agent targeting the macrophage. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2006; 13: 609–99p.
E Cecchi, C Giglioli, S Valente, C Lazzeri, et al. Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2011; 214: 249–256p.
Y Fukumoto, T Hiro, T Fujii, T Fujimura, et aI. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J. Am. CoIl. Cardiol. 2008; 51: 645–650p.
J Ohayon. Influence of residual stress/strain on the biomechanical stability of vulnerable coronary plaques: potential impact for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. Am. J. Physiol. Heart. 2007; 293: 1987–1996p.
A C Akyildiz, L Speelman, H Van Brummelen, M A Gutiérrez, et al. Effects of intima stiffness and plaque morphology on peak cap stress. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2011; 10(1): 25p.
D Tang, Z Teng, G Canton, T S Hatsukami, et al. Local critical stress correlates better than global maximum stress with plaque morphological features linked to atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: an in vivo multi-patient study. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2009; 8(1): 15p.
R Beaumont, K Bhaganagar, B Segee, O Badak. Using fuzzy logic for morphological classification of IVUS-based plaques in diseased coronary artery in the context of flow-dynamics. Soft comput. 2010; 14: 265–272p.
K Bhaganagar, C Veeramachaneni, C Moreno. Significance of plaque morphology in modifying flow characteristics in a diseased coronary artery: Numerical simulation using plaque measurements from intravascular ultrasound imaging. Appl. Math. Model. 2013; 37: 5381–5393p.
H Afrasiab, M R Movahhedy, A Assempour. Fluid–structure interaction analysis in microfluidic devices: A dimensionless finite element approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 2012; 68: 1073–1086p.
H Afrasiab, M R Movahhedy. Treatment of the small time instability in the finite element analysis of fluid structure interaction problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids. 2013; 71: 756–771p.
J C Wang, S T Normand, L Mauri, R E Kuntz. Coronary artery spatial distribution of acute myocardial infarction occlusions. Circulation. 2004; 110: 278–284p.
R Virmani, A P Burke, A Farb, F D Kolodgie. Clinical and Pathological Correlates. In: Brown, D.L. (Ed.), Cardiovascular plaque rupture. CRC press. 2002; 44(1): 51–61p.
B C Konala, A Das, R K Banerjee. Influence of arterial wall-stenosis compliance on the coronary diagnostic parameters. J. Biomech. 2011; 44: 842–847p.
SRH Barrett, MPF Sutcliffe, S Howarth., Z Y Li, et al. Experimental measurement of the mechanical properties of carotid atherothrombotic plaque fibrous cap. J. Biomech. 2009; 42: 1650–1655p.
S A Kock, J V Nygaard, N Eldrup, E T Fründ, et al. Mechanical stresses in carotid plaques using MRI-based fluid–structure interaction models. J. Biomech. 2008; 41: 1651–1658p.
A Karimi, M Navidbakhsh, A Shojaei, S Faghihi. Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013; 33: 2550–2554p.
K Stein., T E Tezduyar, R Benney. Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements. J. Appl. Mech. 2003; 70: 59–63p
R Stoelting, S Hillier. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. US: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
S Turek, J Hron, M Mádlík, M Razzaq, et al. Numerical simulation and benchmarking of a monolithic multigrid solver for fluid-structure interaction problems with application to hemodynamics: in Fluid-structure interaction: modelling, simulation, optimization II. In: Barth TJ, Griebel M, Keyes DE, Roose D, Schlick T, Niem RM, editor. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
- There are currently no refbacks.